Here i discuss Gaussian integer and property of Gaussian integer
x+iy in complex number is a Gaussian integer if x and y are integers
they are closed under addition subtraction and multiplication
A Gaussian integer a + bi is prime if and only if:
* one of a, b is zero and the other is a prime of the form 4n + 3 or its negative − (4n + 3) (where n \geq 0)
* or both are nonzero and a2 + b2 is prime.
13 is not a Gaussian prime because 13 = 9+4 = (3^2+2^2) = (3+2i)(3-2i)
any prime number of the form 4n+1 can be expressed as sum of 2 squares and cannot be a Gaussian prime.
but a prime of the form 4n+3 cannot be expressed as sum of 2 squares and hence Gaussian prime.
2 is a special prime as it is not odd and 2 = 1^2+1^2 = (1+i)(1-i)
some short and selected math problems of different levels in random order I try to keep the ans simple
Sunday, February 27, 2011
Friday, February 25, 2011
2011/019) Prove that Sin (a +b ) sin (a-b) = sin ^2 a – sin ^2b
The above is an interesting identify in trigonometry and this can be done wrongly with out understanding trigonometry
As we do not know trigonometry we take sin as a multiplier
So sin (a+b) = sin a + sin b
And sin (a-b) = sin a – sin b
Multiply them to get
Sin (a+b) sin (a-b) = (sin a + sin b) (sin a - sin b)
= sin ^2 a – sin ^2 b
however above is wrong but the ans is right
now to the correct approach
Sin (a+b) sin (a-b)
= (sin a cos b + cos a sin b)(sin a cos b – cos a sin b)
= sin ^2 a cos^2b – cos^2 a sin ^2b
= sin ^2 a(1- sin ^2 b) – cos^2 a sin ^2 b
= sin ^2 a – sin ^2 a sin ^2 b – cos^2 a sin^2 b
= sin ^2 a – sin ^2 b(sin ^2 a + cos^2 a)
= sin ^2 a – sin ^2 b
The above example is to demonstrate that we get right result through erroneous approach and one need to be careful about it
As we do not know trigonometry we take sin as a multiplier
So sin (a+b) = sin a + sin b
And sin (a-b) = sin a – sin b
Multiply them to get
Sin (a+b) sin (a-b) = (sin a + sin b) (sin a - sin b)
= sin ^2 a – sin ^2 b
however above is wrong but the ans is right
now to the correct approach
Sin (a+b) sin (a-b)
= (sin a cos b + cos a sin b)(sin a cos b – cos a sin b)
= sin ^2 a cos^2b – cos^2 a sin ^2b
= sin ^2 a(1- sin ^2 b) – cos^2 a sin ^2 b
= sin ^2 a – sin ^2 a sin ^2 b – cos^2 a sin^2 b
= sin ^2 a – sin ^2 b(sin ^2 a + cos^2 a)
= sin ^2 a – sin ^2 b
The above example is to demonstrate that we get right result through erroneous approach and one need to be careful about it
Sunday, February 20, 2011
2011/018) Prove that in the product
(1-x+x^2-x^3+ ..... - x^99 + x^100) ( 1 +x +x^2 + .. x^99 + x^100) after multiplying there does not appear a term of x odd degree.
this problem is solved by taking coefficient in a couple of books and I try to solve in a different approach
LHS = (1-x^101)/(1-x) * (1+ x^101)/(1+x)
= (1-x^202)/(1-x^2)
if we define f(x) = (1-x^101)/(1-x) then f(x^2) is the given expression and as it is division of p(x^2) by q(x^2) so cannot have any term other than (x^2)^2k or odd power of x
this problem is solved by taking coefficient in a couple of books and I try to solve in a different approach
LHS = (1-x^101)/(1-x) * (1+ x^101)/(1+x)
= (1-x^202)/(1-x^2)
if we define f(x) = (1-x^101)/(1-x) then f(x^2) is the given expression and as it is division of p(x^2) by q(x^2) so cannot have any term other than (x^2)^2k or odd power of x
Saturday, February 19, 2011
2011/017) if ( p and q) are roots of equation (x-a)(x-b) = c then
-->
Roots of equation (x-p)(x-q) + c are
b) bc
c) a,b
d) (a+c), (b+c)
solution
we have
(x-a)(x-b)) - c = x^2- (a+b) x+ (ab-c)
As p and q are roots so p+ q = a + b …1
and pq = ab – c or pq + c = ab …2
Now
(x-p)(x-q) + c = x^2 - (p+ q) x + (pq + c)
= x^2-(a+b)x + ab = (x-a)(x-b) ( from 1 and 2)
So roots are a and b
hence ans is c)Sunday, February 13, 2011
2011/016) a problem with repunit
A number is called repuint if all the digits of the number are 1 that is it is 1 , 11 , 111 so on
in a repunit number with 50 1's the 26th digit from the left is modified to some digit so that is is divisible by 13. what is the digit
Ans:
method 1
say the digit x
the number is 1(25 times)x1(24 times)
= (10^50-1)/9 + (x-1)(10^25-1)/9
we need to find x such that
(10^50-1)/9 + (x-1)(10^25-1)/9 mod 13 = 0
as 9 is coprime to 13
so (10^50-1)+ (x-1) )(10^25 -1)mod 13 = 0
as 10 and 13 are coprime so as per format's little theorem
10^12 = 1 mod 13
so 10^48 = 1 mod 13
so 10^50 = 100 mod 13
so (10^50-1)+ (x-1) )(10 -1) =
(100-1) + 9(x-1) mod 13 = 0
99 + 9x - 9 or 90+9x = 0 mod 13 or 10 +x = 0 mod 13 or x= 3
so ans = 3
Method 2
sequence of 12 1's is divisible by 13 so we subtract sequence of 12 1's and divide by 10^12 and do it 2 times
we get 1...(25times)x
as seqeunece of sequence of 12 1's is divisible by 13 so multiplying by any number so multiply by 10^14 and subtract
we get 1..(13 times) x
as sequence of 12 1's is divisible by 13 so multiplying by any number so multiply by 10^2 and subtract
1x is the number and divisible by 13 so x = 3
in a repunit number with 50 1's the 26th digit from the left is modified to some digit so that is is divisible by 13. what is the digit
Ans:
method 1
say the digit x
the number is 1(25 times)x1(24 times)
= (10^50-1)/9 + (x-1)(10^25-1)/9
we need to find x such that
(10^50-1)/9 + (x-1)(10^25-1)/9 mod 13 = 0
as 9 is coprime to 13
so (10^50-1)+ (x-1) )(10^25 -1)mod 13 = 0
as 10 and 13 are coprime so as per format's little theorem
10^12 = 1 mod 13
so 10^48 = 1 mod 13
so 10^50 = 100 mod 13
so (10^50-1)+ (x-1) )(10 -1) =
(100-1) + 9(x-1) mod 13 = 0
99 + 9x - 9 or 90+9x = 0 mod 13 or 10 +x = 0 mod 13 or x= 3
so ans = 3
Method 2
sequence of 12 1's is divisible by 13 so we subtract sequence of 12 1's and divide by 10^12 and do it 2 times
we get 1...(25times)x
as seqeunece of sequence of 12 1's is divisible by 13 so multiplying by any number so multiply by 10^14 and subtract
we get 1..(13 times) x
as sequence of 12 1's is divisible by 13 so multiplying by any number so multiply by 10^2 and subtract
1x is the number and divisible by 13 so x = 3
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
2011/015) Let p be a prime number > 5. Show that p divides infinitely many of the numbers 1, 11, 111 ...
as p > 5 p and 10 are coprimes and so are p and 9
so if p devides x <=> p devides 9x
so p devides 9, 99, 999, so on
so 10^n mod p = 1
now as p and 10 are co-primes then
10^n(p-1) is 1 mod p(for n = 1 ... )
or 10^n(p-1) -1 is divsible by p
or (10^n(p-1)-1)/9 that is 1 repeated n(p -1) is dvisible by p
so there are many numbers divisible by p
so if p devides x <=> p devides 9x
so p devides 9, 99, 999, so on
so 10^n mod p = 1
now as p and 10 are co-primes then
10^n(p-1) is 1 mod p(for n = 1 ... )
or 10^n(p-1) -1 is divsible by p
or (10^n(p-1)-1)/9 that is 1 repeated n(p -1) is dvisible by p
so there are many numbers divisible by p
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
2011/014) Proof of existence of infinite prime numbers.
There are infininite number of prime numbers and there are a couple of proofs these are in the linked list below
http://primes.utm.edu/notes/proofs/infinite/index.html
I propose a proof that is simpler
If I prove that if for any n there is a prime > n then I am through
Let us consider n!+1
This does not have any factor from 2 to n and hence it is a prime or in case it is not a prime then prime factor > n.
So for any n there is a prime number> n
Hence proved
http://primes.utm.edu/notes/proofs/infinite/index.html
I propose a proof that is simpler
If I prove that if for any n there is a prime > n then I am through
Let us consider n!+1
This does not have any factor from 2 to n and hence it is a prime or in case it is not a prime then prime factor > n.
So for any n there is a prime number> n
Hence proved
Monday, February 7, 2011
2011/013) factorization using short cuts.
1) (a+b+c)^3 - a^3-b^3-c^3
we know that (a+b+c)^3 - a^3 is divisible by (a+b+c) – a that is b+ c
and b^3+c^3 by (b+c)
hence b+c is a factor
by symmetry (a+b) and (c+a) are also factors
2) so it is (a+b+c)^3 - a^3-b^3-c^3 = m(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)
now as LHS does not contain a^3 or b^3 or c^3 (as they cancel out) so m has to be a constant
putting a =1 b = 1 and c = 1 we get LHS = 24 and RHS = 8m or m = 3
hence (a+b+c)^3 - a^3-b^3-c^3 = 3(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)
we know that (a+b+c)^3 - a^3 is divisible by (a+b+c) – a that is b+ c
and b^3+c^3 by (b+c)
hence b+c is a factor
by symmetry (a+b) and (c+a) are also factors
2) so it is (a+b+c)^3 - a^3-b^3-c^3 = m(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)
now as LHS does not contain a^3 or b^3 or c^3 (as they cancel out) so m has to be a constant
putting a =1 b = 1 and c = 1 we get LHS = 24 and RHS = 8m or m = 3
hence (a+b+c)^3 - a^3-b^3-c^3 = 3(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)
Sunday, February 6, 2011
2011/012) To construct an AP of integers so that 3 successive elements are perfect squares.
It is proved that we cannot have an AP whose 4 successive terms are in perfect squares
But does there exist an AP whose 3 consecutive terms are perfect squares
Solution:
Let the 3 consecutive term be a^2,b^2,c^2
As they are in AP we have
b^2-a^2 = c^2-b^2
or a^2+c^2 = 2b^2
this has a solution and we know that
if x^2 + y^2 = z^2
then (x+y)^2 + (x-y)^2 = 2(x^2+y^2) = 2z^2
so if (x,y,z) is a Pythagorean triplet the (x-y)^2 , z^2, (x+y)^2 are perfect squares and are in AP.
Or a= x-y
b = z^2
v= x+ y
for example
(3,4,5) is Pythagorean triplet so (4-3)^2, 5^2,(4+3)^2 or 1,25,49
(5,12,13) Pythagorean triplet so (12-5)^2, 13^2,(12+5)^2 or 49,169,289
Parametric form of Pythagorean triplet is
(m^2-n^2), (2mn), m^2 + n^2
So Parametric form of the required AP is
(m^2-n^2-2mn)^2,(m^2+n^2)^2,(m^2-n^2+2mn)^2
But does there exist an AP whose 3 consecutive terms are perfect squares
Solution:
Let the 3 consecutive term be a^2,b^2,c^2
As they are in AP we have
b^2-a^2 = c^2-b^2
or a^2+c^2 = 2b^2
this has a solution and we know that
if x^2 + y^2 = z^2
then (x+y)^2 + (x-y)^2 = 2(x^2+y^2) = 2z^2
so if (x,y,z) is a Pythagorean triplet the (x-y)^2 , z^2, (x+y)^2 are perfect squares and are in AP.
Or a= x-y
b = z^2
v= x+ y
for example
(3,4,5) is Pythagorean triplet so (4-3)^2, 5^2,(4+3)^2 or 1,25,49
(5,12,13) Pythagorean triplet so (12-5)^2, 13^2,(12+5)^2 or 49,169,289
Parametric form of Pythagorean triplet is
(m^2-n^2), (2mn), m^2 + n^2
So Parametric form of the required AP is
(m^2-n^2-2mn)^2,(m^2+n^2)^2,(m^2-n^2+2mn)^2
Friday, February 4, 2011
2011/011) what is the smallest prime factor of 2010! +1
As per Wilson's theorem for prime p
(p- 1)! = - 1 mod p
as as 2011 is a prime number
2010 ! = - 1 mod 2011
so 2011 is a factor of 2010 ! + 1
and as 2 to 2010 cannot divide it so smallest prime factor is 2011
(p- 1)! = - 1 mod p
as as 2011 is a prime number
2010 ! = - 1 mod 2011
so 2011 is a factor of 2010 ! + 1
and as 2 to 2010 cannot divide it so smallest prime factor is 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)