prove that 4p^3 + q^2 =0
proof:
(x-k)^2 is a factor of x^3+3px + q so x-k is factor of this as well as derivative of this
so (x-k) is a factor so k^3 + 3pk + q = 0
and (x-k) is a factor of d/dx (x^3+3px + q) or 3x^2 + 3p or x^2+p =0
so k^2 + p = 0 ... 1 or p = -k^2
sum of zeros zero so 3rd factor = -2k
product = -2k^3 = q ...2
from 1 p = - k^2 or p^3 = -k^6 or 4p = -4k^6
and q^2 = 4k^6by adding we get 4p^3+q^2 = 0
some short and selected math problems of different levels in random order I try to keep the ans simple
Saturday, September 25, 2010
2010/040) Let f(x) be a polynomial of degree>2
if f(x) is divided by (x-1) and(x-2)...?
it leaves a remainder 0,2 respectively.what is the remainder when f(x) is divided by (x-1)(x-2).
if f(x) is divided by (x-1)(x-2) remainder shall be a polynomial of degree 1
f(x) = p(x)(x-1)(x-2) + a x +b
f(1) = a + b = 0 so a = - b is the remainder when divided by (x-1)
f(2) = 2a + b = 2 so -2b +b = 2 or b - 2 and a = 2
so remainder = 2x - 2
it leaves a remainder 0,2 respectively.what is the remainder when f(x) is divided by (x-1)(x-2).
if f(x) is divided by (x-1)(x-2) remainder shall be a polynomial of degree 1
f(x) = p(x)(x-1)(x-2) + a x +b
f(1) = a + b = 0 so a = - b is the remainder when divided by (x-1)
f(2) = 2a + b = 2 so -2b +b = 2 or b - 2 and a = 2
so remainder = 2x - 2
Friday, September 24, 2010
2010/039) A problem in fibonacci sequence
show that
Σ (n = 1 to ∞) F(n)/x^n = x/(x^2-x-1) where F(n) is n th Fibonacci number
Where "x" is any integer >= 2
proof:
this is based on Geometric series and not on relationship in Fibonacci sequence which can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_number#Power_series
We know
F(n) = (p^n – (1-p)^n)/ sqrt(5) where p is phi (value = (1+ sqrt(5))/2)
So sqrt(5) F(n)/x^n = (p/x)^n – (1-p)/x)^n
So Σ (n = 1 to ∞) sqrt(5) F(n)/x^n = Σ (n = 1 to ∞)
(p/x)^n – Σ (n = 1 to ∞) (1-p)/x)^n
As x is positive
The sum converges when (p/x) < 1 and (1-p)/x < 1
Or x > p that is x > the golden ratio and need not be integer.
The sum = 1/(1-(p/x)) – 1/(1-(1-p)/x)
= x/(x-p) – x/(x-1+p)
= x((1/(x-p) – 1/(x-1+p))
= x(x-1+p) –(x-p))/)(x^2- x –(p(p-1))
As p(p-1) = 1 this is x^2-x-1
we get
So Σ (n = 1 to ∞) sqrt(5) F(n)/x^n = x(2p-1)/ (x^2-x-1)
As p = (1+ sqrt(5))/2) so (2p-1) = sqrt(5)
So Σ (n = 1 to ∞) sqrt(5) F(n)/x^n = x sqrt(5)/ (x^2-x-1)
Or Σ (n = 1 to ∞) F(n)/x^n = x/ (x^2-x-1)
Proved
Σ (n = 1 to ∞) F(n)/x^n = x/(x^2-x-1) where F(n) is n th Fibonacci number
Where "x" is any integer >= 2
proof:
this is based on Geometric series and not on relationship in Fibonacci sequence which can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_number#Power_series
We know
F(n) = (p^n – (1-p)^n)/ sqrt(5) where p is phi (value = (1+ sqrt(5))/2)
So sqrt(5) F(n)/x^n = (p/x)^n – (1-p)/x)^n
So Σ (n = 1 to ∞) sqrt(5) F(n)/x^n = Σ (n = 1 to ∞)
(p/x)^n – Σ (n = 1 to ∞) (1-p)/x)^n
As x is positive
The sum converges when (p/x) < 1 and (1-p)/x < 1
Or x > p that is x > the golden ratio and need not be integer.
The sum = 1/(1-(p/x)) – 1/(1-(1-p)/x)
= x/(x-p) – x/(x-1+p)
= x((1/(x-p) – 1/(x-1+p))
= x(x-1+p) –(x-p))/)(x^2- x –(p(p-1))
As p(p-1) = 1 this is x^2-x-1
we get
So Σ (n = 1 to ∞) sqrt(5) F(n)/x^n = x(2p-1)/ (x^2-x-1)
As p = (1+ sqrt(5))/2) so (2p-1) = sqrt(5)
So Σ (n = 1 to ∞) sqrt(5) F(n)/x^n = x sqrt(5)/ (x^2-x-1)
Or Σ (n = 1 to ∞) F(n)/x^n = x/ (x^2-x-1)
Proved
Sunday, September 19, 2010
2010/038) For a natural number n, let An = n^2 + 20
If Dn denotes the greatest common divisor of An and An+1,?
then show that Dn divides 81.
proof:
GCD(An , An+1)as we need to get a constant
= GCD(n^2+20, (n+1)^2 + 20) (one of 1st or 2nd term need to be constant by proper transform)
= GCD(n^2+20, n^2+2n + 21)
= GCD(n^2+20, 2n+1) as GCD(a,b) = GCD(a,b-a)
[now we need to eliminate n^2 from 1st term so we double the 1st term as 2nd term is odd so GCD(a,b) = GCD(2a,b) when b is odd]
= GCD(2n^2+40, 2n+1)
= GCD(2n^2+40-n(2n+1),2n+21) as GCD(a,b) = GCD(a-kb,b) for any k
= GCD(40-n, 2n+1)
= GCD(80-2n, 2n+1) [ same argument above as 2n+1 is odd double the 1st term
= GCD(81, 2n+1) as GCD(a,b) = GCD(a+b.b)
now 81 is constant and GCD must devide 81
then show that Dn divides 81.
proof:
GCD(An , An+1)as we need to get a constant
= GCD(n^2+20, (n+1)^2 + 20) (one of 1st or 2nd term need to be constant by proper transform)
= GCD(n^2+20, n^2+2n + 21)
= GCD(n^2+20, 2n+1) as GCD(a,b) = GCD(a,b-a)
[now we need to eliminate n^2 from 1st term so we double the 1st term as 2nd term is odd so GCD(a,b) = GCD(2a,b) when b is odd]
= GCD(2n^2+40, 2n+1)
= GCD(2n^2+40-n(2n+1),2n+21) as GCD(a,b) = GCD(a-kb,b) for any k
= GCD(40-n, 2n+1)
= GCD(80-2n, 2n+1) [ same argument above as 2n+1 is odd double the 1st term
= GCD(81, 2n+1) as GCD(a,b) = GCD(a+b.b)
now 81 is constant and GCD must devide 81
2010/037) Sum of six consecutive whole squares can never be a whole square
let the 1st number be n^2
sum of 6 consecutive squares is
n^2+(n+1)^2+(n+2)^2+(n+3)^2+(n+4)^2 + (n+5)^2
= 6n^2+ 30n + 55
= 6n(n+5) + 55
1st part 6n(n+5)is divsible by 4 as either n or n+ 5 is even
so 6n(n+5) + 55 mod 4 = 55 mod 4 = 3
it cannot be a perfect square as perfect square mod 4 = 0 or 1
sum of 6 consecutive squares is
n^2+(n+1)^2+(n+2)^2+(n+3)^2+(n+4)^2 + (n+5)^2
= 6n^2+ 30n + 55
= 6n(n+5) + 55
1st part 6n(n+5)is divsible by 4 as either n or n+ 5 is even
so 6n(n+5) + 55 mod 4 = 55 mod 4 = 3
it cannot be a perfect square as perfect square mod 4 = 0 or 1
2010/036) if n is an integer give an example of n consecutive composite integers
in the 1st attempt the solution appears to be
(n+1)! + 2 to (n+1)!+n+1 the kth term is divisible k+1
but it can be bettered as
LCM(2,3,... n+1) + 2 to
LCM(2,3,... n+1) + n+ 1
and LCM(2,3,... n+1) is the lower of the two
It can still be bettered to the product of all primes (<= n+1)say P(n) + 2 to that + n+ 1
as the number from 2 to n+1 if a prime the product has that prime as a factor
and if not a prime then P(n) and and k have a common factor so sum is not a prime
(one of my friends informed me)
(n+1)! + 2 to (n+1)!+n+1 the kth term is divisible k+1
but it can be bettered as
LCM(2,3,... n+1) + 2 to
LCM(2,3,... n+1) + n+ 1
and LCM(2,3,... n+1) is the lower of the two
It can still be bettered to the product of all primes (<= n+1)say P(n) + 2 to that + n+ 1
as the number from 2 to n+1 if a prime the product has that prime as a factor
and if not a prime then P(n) and and k have a common factor so sum is not a prime
(one of my friends informed me)
Thursday, September 16, 2010
2010/035) Show that
27 x (23^n) + 17 x (10^(2n)) is divisible by 11 for all positive integers n
proof:
23 = 1 mod 11
so 23^n = 1 mod 11
10^2 = 100 = 1 mod 11
so 10^2n =1 mod 11
so 27 x (23^n) + 17 x (10^(2n)) = 27 * 1 + 17 * 1 = 44 = 0 mod 11
so divisible by 11
proof:
23 = 1 mod 11
so 23^n = 1 mod 11
10^2 = 100 = 1 mod 11
so 10^2n =1 mod 11
so 27 x (23^n) + 17 x (10^(2n)) = 27 * 1 + 17 * 1 = 44 = 0 mod 11
so divisible by 11
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)