for a proof of it refer to
adding past infinity
of course it is not rue.
where is the fallacy
the problem is in the line
2+ 4 +8+ 16 ...
-1 -2 -4 -8 -16 + ...
if we realise that in the 1st line there is one extra term and that is not infinitesimal to be ignored( the sum diverges and does not converge we see that one term that should not be left out is ignored
No comments:
Post a Comment